plus, think of the demographic breakdown,
itll give us a waayyy better picture of what people actually liked.
I feel that...and I'm willing to try anything. I was just thinking what if it's like
Voter 1 gives:
Dude A - 1
Dude B - 3
Dude C - 2
Thats just the same as saying "I vote for Dude A but Dude B and C had dope beats too"
Voter 2 gives:
Dude A - 1
Dude B - 2
Dude C - 3
And thats just like Voter 2 Saying "I vote for Dude A but Dude B was a close second and
Dude C, I liked your too"
You still have a tie. It seems like you can do the same thing with the way it's going but instead of throwing
two other names out there when we vote....we're just giving the people we didn't vote for feedback. If you
guys want to try it then I'm down....but I just don't want to complicate anything.
It seems like it would be better to give the beats a 1-5 rating with five being the highest....then you could just
add all the points, but then again....voters would have to type ALL the names of the competitors and then at the
end, I'd have to add up all those points. Not saying I'm not dedicated but man...that would be a little rough if you
have a lot of people entering.