Jump to content


Photo

website allows legal sampling?

sampling legalities

  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 reed401

reed401

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 18 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 03 February 2014 - 12:00 PM

.



#2 James Frank.

James Frank.

    Deacon Schmooze

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,795 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DENVER
  • Interests:crates, paint, sashimi, sticks of sherm.

Posted 03 February 2014 - 12:59 PM

i don't get it.
  • Tastik BEATS likes this

#3 Chason

Chason

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 486 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco, CA

Posted 03 February 2014 - 01:34 PM

I was out of breath just reading that.

#4 DELCO

DELCO

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 418 posts

Posted 03 February 2014 - 03:41 PM

I was out of breath just reading that.


Posted Image
  • SunnyMeadowz likes this

#5 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 03:47 PM

Yah,
They didn't make the presentation very sexy.




#6 Berry Woods

Berry Woods

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 449 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 04:03 PM

Over engineering. What we need is a (low) flat rate for sample use, with additional increments based on sales.
  • D'MosPhree likes this

#7 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 04:21 PM

So can anybody explain what the dilly yo is?

#8 orchidthegreat

orchidthegreat

    STMB Official

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 03 February 2014 - 04:25 PM

Sampling is still illegal without compensation or consent. Thread closed.

#9 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 04:29 PM

Yes but these guys have figured out some ingenious way as to how to make it profitable and legal. They are geniuses who are so smart, their explanation is difficult to comprehend. I believe they did it, like I believe in magic.



I am trying to be funny, but honestly, I would like to know this magical new system.
#WontWork

#10 James Frank.

James Frank.

    Deacon Schmooze

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,795 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DENVER
  • Interests:crates, paint, sashimi, sticks of sherm.

Posted 03 February 2014 - 04:33 PM

basically they're operating like the pastebin of sampling clearance companies, from what i understand. they have this weird algorithm that technically makes it a different song than the original; however, you still have to 1) list your credited sample, and 2) have a copy of said source material on your computer if you want to hear the beat. it's basically like an over-exaggerated version of linking source material to your project on a DAW...because if you move that file between times you've opened it to work on, it will say something like "cannot find '__________.wav' "or something, and therefore none of the samples will play that it can't find. to me it just sounds really, really stupid.

#11 fungus

fungus

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 258 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Traverse City / Detroit, MI

Posted 03 February 2014 - 04:56 PM

I dont really get it either, but the website looks really douchy
  • James Frank. likes this

#12 James Frank.

James Frank.

    Deacon Schmooze

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,795 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DENVER
  • Interests:crates, paint, sashimi, sticks of sherm.

Posted 03 February 2014 - 05:02 PM

^amen. gtfoh, sketchy "legal" sampling services are straight-up WHACK

#13 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 05:08 PM

I don't understand cats who do straight up samples now adays anyway. I mean some really obscure shit sure, but as a producer, I always felt bad, or lazy, if I just took a sample and looped it. I needed to chop, layer, add shit in, rearrange pan, pitch shift etc. most of my chunes I don't think would be found guilty of copyright infringement.

#14 Berry Woods

Berry Woods

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 449 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:04 PM

Damn right Mangoes, and once you have done that I can't see how this program would be able to reproduce your tune even if you listed your sources. Even if you were straight loop jackin like Diddy, I wonder how far you would need to adjust pitch/timing/EQ/sequence before it couldn't 'rebuild' your song or whatever it does. Essentially it would need to be able to to recreate anything anybody might do to a sample in any DAW/Sampler, seems very unlikely.

#15 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:30 PM

True,
Some of my more complex, in depth tunes chopped a single source a hundred times, rearranged.

Anyhow, I digress.

On a side note, do you know that Diddy's I'll be missing you has made something like a 100 million in profits, but Diddy has not seen a penny since he never asked Sting for sample permission. So, Sting has gotten it all.



#16 Berry Woods

Berry Woods

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 449 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2014 - 08:47 PM

Oh well I suppose it doesn't matter since that 'song' was a heartfelt tribute to his 'friend', just like reading a poem at his wake or something, and not at all an attempt to cash in or raise profile on the back of his death.

Ur loops is ill btw, that thing got no chance unpicking them!

Like Sting needs any more money!
  • mangoes cash likes this

#17 James Frank.

James Frank.

    Deacon Schmooze

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,795 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DENVER
  • Interests:crates, paint, sashimi, sticks of sherm.

Posted 03 February 2014 - 09:45 PM

Posted Image

#18 Tastik BEATS

Tastik BEATS

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 397 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:Producing cloudy, phonky beats
  • Soundcloud:https://soundcloud.com/tastik

Posted 03 February 2014 - 09:55 PM

Oh well I suppose it doesn't matter since that 'song' was a heartfelt tribute to his 'friend', just like reading a poem at his wake or something, and not at all an attempt to cash in or raise profile on the back of his death.

Ur loops is ill btw, that thing got no chance unpicking them!

Like Sting needs any more money!


So heartfelt that it was ghostwritten. LOL

#19 Flip Chillson

Flip Chillson

    Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 77 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 04 February 2014 - 02:04 AM




#20 Berry Woods

Berry Woods

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 449 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 February 2014 - 02:40 AM

There seem to be many flaws. If you sample from vinyl, the waveform is different to the same song waveform sampled from CD, and different again from mp3, so this ting only works if you get all ur shit off iTunes or whatever in identical format andso does the end listener, otherwise it won't match. iTunes ain't got that turkish folk lp you took that tambourine off etc. I would have to hear it from a record company lawyer that they are cool with this shit. Also they are claiming that they can recreate whatever you did to a sample in your sampler/Daw. This will fold, quick imo or just be for people doing very basic David Guetta remixes using mp3s, toys basically.
  • reed401 likes this

#21 Tastik BEATS

Tastik BEATS

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 397 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:Producing cloudy, phonky beats
  • Soundcloud:https://soundcloud.com/tastik

Posted 04 February 2014 - 03:25 AM

http://youtu.be/Ckh76KzjTN0
http://youtu.be/1rPA0BGfsjE


This is so wack

#22 Tastik BEATS

Tastik BEATS

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 397 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:Producing cloudy, phonky beats
  • Soundcloud:https://soundcloud.com/tastik

Posted 04 February 2014 - 03:28 AM

There seem to be many flaws. If you sample from vinyl, the waveform is different to the same song waveform sampled from CD, and different again from mp3, so this ting only works if you get all ur shit off iTunes or whatever in identical format andso does the end listener, otherwise it won't match. iTunes ain't got that turkish folk lp you took that tambourine off etc. I would have to hear it from a record company lawyer that they are cool with this shit. Also they are claiming that they can recreate whatever you did to a sample in your sampler/Daw. This will fold, quick imo or just be for people doing very basic David Guetta remixes using mp3s, toys basically.


what if you pitched it down, reversed it, sampled it i a sp12, added reverb and delay. How they gonna do dat. And what if you use some drum samples that you bought. How are they gonna lay down the exact same drum over the samples. Also what if theres a rapper on the top ???

#23 Berry Woods

Berry Woods

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 449 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 February 2014 - 03:33 AM

Exactly bro

#24 SunnyMeadowz

SunnyMeadowz

    The Royal Dutch of Dukes

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,334 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver
  • Interests:Weed, Pussy, Records (In no particular order)

Posted 04 February 2014 - 04:13 AM

The real question is, who's gonna be the first person around these parts to test drive this incredibly stupid website?
  • Tastik BEATS likes this

#25 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 February 2014 - 05:55 AM

So wait,
You make a song, from samples. You list the samples used and expect someone else to recreate the song on there own,with the sampled music?? Whu? This is just disturbingly bad.


2 legit mix 2 quit.


Edit.
It sounds like the creators are used to thier sampled music being a straight up, obvious loop with drums added in. Nothing too tricky.... Or good. Oh man this is terrible.

Edit edit.
It could be a good thing if, you just listed samples used and purchasers bought a package payin you and the sampled artists, but this whole recreate the song thing.., Whu?
  • Tastik BEATS and reed401 like this

#26 MWBOOGIE

MWBOOGIE

    STMB Official

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 959 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 February 2014 - 01:13 PM

True,
Some of my more complex, in depth tunes chopped a single source a hundred times, rearranged.

Anyhow, I digress.

On a side note, do you know that Diddy's I'll be missing you has made something like a 100 million in profits, but Diddy has not seen a penny since he never asked Sting for sample permission. So, Sting has gotten it all.


I am inclined to say that info is In error. I read that Sting was paid for the sample.

#27 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 February 2014 - 01:26 PM

Thats what I heard very recently! tho I think it was from Buzzfeed, "did you know??" Kind of thing giving random facts about random things.

Edit.
http://ultimateclass...ddy-2000-a-day/
2000 smackers a day in royalties. Sheesh.

#28 Flip Chillson

Flip Chillson

    Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 77 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 05 February 2014 - 12:49 AM

It's suspect .

their algorithm scans the samples

puts it in a database

however you manipulate the sample it's in the database

now that sample can be identified no matter what a producer does to it.

reversed

inverted

chopped up

filtered

its in the database.

SUSPECT

#29 Berry Woods

Berry Woods

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 449 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 February 2014 - 01:41 AM

For anybody who didn't quite get it yet:

Producer/remixer uploads entire track as a 2track, not stems, into Legit Mix

Producer/remixer names all samples used

Legit Mix customers/purchasers can listen to track/composition as the producer/remixer intended including sampled content, online

If a customer/purchaser wishes to buy a track/composition, Legit Mix software removes the sampled content and provides downloadable version of producer/remixer's track without the sampled content

Legit Mix software scans customer/purchaser's computer for the source tracks containing the sampled content

If customer/purchaser does not own the required source tracks, they are linked to the opportunity to buy them

Legit Mix software then 'rebuilds' the producer/remixers track/composition including the sampled content which is legitimately owned by the customer/purchaser - meaning, according to Legit Mix that there is no copyright infringement.

They claim that it does not matter what the producer/remixer did to the samples in their DAW/sampler, because the Legit Mix software uses a 'binary algorithm' which can recreate it.


I have pointed out the obvious flaws with all this earlier in the thread

It smells of rat an' fish
  • reed401 likes this

#30 mangoes cash

mangoes cash

    STMB Deluxe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,151 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 February 2014 - 06:46 AM

I think these guys had an idea, they an idea they came up with and were so blown away by it, but never had anyone do a reality check. They probably invested a lot of cash into what they thought was going to revolutionist he industry.


Basically, they did not think it through.
Dumb Asses. I can see them now. "Oh boy this is going to be great!" Sitting in moms basement.
  • Tastik BEATS and reed401 like this





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: sampling, legalities

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users