Jump to content


Photo

Design of artificial intelligence must read


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 MathsGuru

MathsGuru

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 08 August 2013 - 04:13 PM

Design of artificial intelligence must read

[1 paradox]Why 0.999... is not equal to 1?

Written in 2012

The current mathematic theory tells us, 1>0.9, 1>0.99, 1>0.999, ..., but at last it says 1=0.999..., a negation of itself (Proof 0.999... =1: 1/9=0.111..., 1/9x9=1, 0.111...x9=0.999..., so 1=0.999...). So it is totally a paradox, name it as 【1 paradox】. You see this is a mathematic problem at first, actually it is a philosophic problem. Then we can resolve it. Because math is a incomplete theory, only philosophy could be a complete one. The answer is that 0.999... is not equal to 1. Because of these reasons:

1. The infinite world and finite world.

We live in one world but made up of two parts: the infinite part and the finite part. But we develop our mathematic system based on the finite part, because we never entered into the infinite part. Your attention, God is in it.

0.999... is a number in the infinite world, but 1 is a number in the finite world. For example, 1 represents an apple. But then 0.999...? We don't know. That is to say, we can't use a number in the infinite world to plus a number in the finite world. For example, an apple plus an apple, we say it is 1+1=2, we get two apples, but if it is an apple plus a banana, we only can say we get two fruits. The key problem is we don't know what is 0.999..., we can get nothing. So we can't say 9+0.999...=9.999... or 10, etc.

We can use "infinite world" and "finite world" to resolve some of zeno's paradox, too.

2. lim0.999...=1, not 0.999...=1.

3.The indeterminate principle.

Because of the indeterminate principle, 1/9 is not equal to 0.111....

For example, cut an apple into nine equal parts, then every part of it is 1/9. But if you use different measure tools to measure the volume of every part, it is indeterminate. That is to say, you may find the volume could not exactly be 0.111..., but it would be 0.123, 0.1142, or 0.11425, etc.

Now we end a biggest mathematical crisis. But most important is this standpoint tells us, our world is only a sample from a sample space. When you realized this, and that the current probability theory is wrong, when you find the Meta-sample-space, you would be able to create a real AI-system. It will indicate that there must be one God-system in the system, which is the controller. Look our world, there must be one God, as for us, only some robots. Maybe we are in a God's game, WHO KNOWS?

相关阅读:
1、星际争霸1的AI设计思路:以人族开局为例
(最初出处bbs.plu.cn/thread-1821107-1-1.html)
2、诸神之战在星际争霸1的实现[001]AI游戏的发端
home.eeworld.com.cn/my/space.php?uid=454999
3、绝对真理的内涵、架构与印证
zh.netlog.com/aiforsc/blog/
4、概率论:完全可能性的理论与现实图景
auto-zhang.eu/home.php?mod=space&uid=20818&do=blog&view=me&from=space
5、悖论问题的统一解
aiforsc.wordpress.com
6、从延安文艺座谈会到人类社会的未来
blog.youthwant.com.tw/b.php?bid=55738
7、发现号航天飞机——自然算法伟大的飞矢变换
forum.alive.hk/blog.php?uid=34187
8、千古同一梦,开门笑解痴——我的红楼梦
backupbase.tumblr.com

More infos, download txt files from:
(1)speedyshare.com/DQz9y/AiforSC.rar
(2)filerio.in/kw4cl2l2y3qi
(3)8nlkzh.dl4free.com/en
(4)ge.tt/8M7YKlk/v/0
(5)freegigstorage.com/download.php?file=399AiforSC.rar

Attached Files



#2 Grifty-Rodriguez

Grifty-Rodriguez

    STMB Tapatío

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gilroy, California
  • Interests:Burritos, HipHop
  • Soundcloud:http://soundcloud.com/grifty

Posted 08 August 2013 - 05:59 PM

dam fool where you buy your herb?
  • DJ Projexion likes this

#3 ziggyt

ziggyt

    Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:MAN E FACE
  • Interests:MAN E FACE
  • Soundcloud:http://soundcloud.com/tangent1

Posted 08 August 2013 - 10:42 PM

He Smoking green crack and doing homework at the same time

#4 DJ Primate

DJ Primate

    The Soulful Senior

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin, TEXAS

Posted 09 August 2013 - 01:29 AM

This is fascinating in a "there's a drunk mathemetician yelling about mathematical paradoxes and god in the street" kind of way, and I'm pretty sure 0.999... does actually equal 1.
Anyone curious enough to download that .zip?

#5 SunnyMeadowz

SunnyMeadowz

    Dutch of Dukes

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,910 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver
  • Interests:Weed, Pussy, Records (In no particular order)

Posted 09 August 2013 - 01:39 AM

Anyone curious enough to download that .zip?


And have MathsGuru log every keystroke I make? No thanks.

#6 ODK

ODK

    Lab Cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,033 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Within The Multiverse
  • Interests:Socks, Toilet Rolls, and Vegetable Samosas!
  • Soundcloud:http://soundcloud.com/i-am-heisenberg

Posted 09 August 2013 - 03:45 AM

Design of artificial intelligence must read

[1 paradox]Why 0.999... is not equal to 1?

Written in 2012

The current mathematic theory tells us, 1>0.9, 1>0.99, 1>0.999, ..., but at last it says 1=0.999..., a negation of itself (Proof 0.999... =1: 1/9=0.111..., 1/9x9=1, 0.111...x9=0.999..., so 1=0.999...). So it is totally a paradox, name it as 【1 paradox】. You see this is a mathematic problem at first, actually it is a philosophic problem. Then we can resolve it. Because math is a incomplete theory, only philosophy could be a complete one. The answer is that 0.999... is not equal to 1. Because of these reasons:

1. The infinite world and finite world.

We live in one world but made up of two parts: the infinite part and the finite part. But we develop our mathematic system based on the finite part, because we never entered into the infinite part. Your attention, God is in it.

0.999... is a number in the infinite world, but 1 is a number in the finite world. For example, 1 represents an apple. But then 0.999...? We don't know. That is to say, we can't use a number in the infinite world to plus a number in the finite world. For example, an apple plus an apple, we say it is 1+1=2, we get two apples, but if it is an apple plus a banana, we only can say we get two fruits. The key problem is we don't know what is 0.999..., we can get nothing. So we can't say 9+0.999...=9.999... or 10, etc.

We can use "infinite world" and "finite world" to resolve some of zeno's paradox, too.

2. lim0.999...=1, not 0.999...=1.

3.The indeterminate principle.

Because of the indeterminate principle, 1/9 is not equal to 0.111....

For example, cut an apple into nine equal parts, then every part of it is 1/9. But if you use different measure tools to measure the volume of every part, it is indeterminate. That is to say, you may find the volume could not exactly be 0.111..., but it would be 0.123, 0.1142, or 0.11425, etc.

Now we end a biggest mathematical crisis. But most important is this standpoint tells us, our world is only a sample from a sample space. When you realized this, and that the current probability theory is wrong, when you find the Meta-sample-space, you would be able to create a real AI-system. It will indicate that there must be one God-system in the system, which is the controller. Look our world, there must be one God, as for us, only some robots. Maybe we are in a God's game, WHO KNOWS?

相关阅读:
1、星际争霸1的AI设计思路:以人族开局为例
(最初出处bbs.plu.cn/thread-1821107-1-1.html)
2、诸神之战在星际争霸1的实现[001]AI游戏的发端
home.eeworld.com.cn/my/space.php?uid=454999
3、绝对真理的内涵、架构与印证
zh.netlog.com/aiforsc/blog/
4、概率论:完全可能性的理论与现实图景
auto-zhang.eu/home.php?mod=space&uid=20818&do=blog&view=me&from=space
5、悖论问题的统一解
aiforsc.wordpress.com
6、从延安文艺座谈会到人类社会的未来
blog.youthwant.com.tw/b.php?bid=55738
7、发现号航天飞机——自然算法伟大的飞矢变换
forum.alive.hk/blog.php?uid=34187
8、千古同一梦,开门笑解痴——我的红楼梦
backupbase.tumblr.com

More infos, download txt files from:
(1)speedyshare.com/DQz9y/AiforSC.rar
(2)filerio.in/kw4cl2l2y3qi
(3)8nlkzh.dl4free.com/en
(4)ge.tt/8M7YKlk/v/0
(5)freegigstorage.com/download.php?file=399AiforSC.rar


Heres a little number game for you,

111 x 111,=
1111 x 1111 = do it yourself look at the number pattern.
666 x 666 =

Short and curlies = there is no being like controller or one God, we are all the same consciousness divided up into skin spacesuits (Your Body), we are the bloke we keep looking up into the skies for and have completely forgotten ourselves and our potential. Reality is only solid because we're tuned in like a radio to see that, it is also how slowly things vibrate which causes them to appear solid ( Yes the wall will hurt your head because your decoding that as your reality). What we are all part of is a broadcast play-out, something is resonating a frequency to hold this all in place, have a look at sacred geometry, check out sound forming rice into patterns and shapes, we're controlled completely like lab rats, but the controller is certainly not god like, and does not have our best interests at heart, and numbers can't work without letters, they are glyph's an runes, if you spend the first 15 years hearing teachers saying maths and numbers and english and words, it's quite hard to believe or see they are man made for a completely fifferent purpose, but you can't hide that form an aware awake mind that is tuned into something different, look at reality this way now do the maths and it will all add up.

#7 James Frank.

James Frank.

    Rookie of the Year

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,889 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DENVER
  • Interests:crates, paint, sashimi, sticks of sherm.

Posted 11 August 2013 - 07:31 PM

this is some deep shit on this thread.

#8 soulREBEL360

soulREBEL360

    Certified ST Dope(ness) Pusher

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,057 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Everywhere and nowhere.
  • Soundcloud:www.soundcloud.com/soulrebel360

Posted 12 August 2013 - 03:32 PM

Heres a little number game for you,

111 x 111,=
1111 x 1111 = do it yourself look at the number pattern.
666 x 666 =

Short and curlies = there is no being like controller or one God, we are all the same consciousness divided up into skin spacesuits (Your Body), we are the bloke we keep looking up into the skies for and have completely forgotten ourselves and our potential. Reality is only solid because we're tuned in like a radio to see that, it is also how slowly things vibrate which causes them to appear solid ( Yes the wall will hurt your head because your decoding that as your reality). What we are all part of is a broadcast play-out, something is resonating a frequency to hold this all in place, have a look at sacred geometry, check out sound forming rice into patterns and shapes, we're controlled completely like lab rats, but the controller is certainly not god like, and does not have our best interests at heart, and numbers can't work without letters, they are glyph's an runes, if you spend the first 15 years hearing teachers saying maths and numbers and english and words, it's quite hard to believe or see they are man made for a completely fifferent purpose, but you can't hide that form an aware awake mind that is tuned into something different, look at reality this way now do the maths and it will all add up.


*adjusts glasses and strokes beard*

I see .... yesh yesh ... so you're saying that 1 cannot multiply itself by itself. Care to elaborate further on your theory for myself and the kind people in this thread, my good lad?

#9 DJ Primate

DJ Primate

    The Soulful Senior

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin, TEXAS

Posted 12 August 2013 - 05:59 PM

Heres a little number game for you,

111 x 111,=
1111 x 1111 = do it yourself look at the number pattern.
666 x 666 =

Short and curlies = there is no being like controller or one God, we are all the same consciousness divided up into skin spacesuits (Your Body), we are the bloke we keep looking up into the skies for and have completely forgotten ourselves and our potential. Reality is only solid because we're tuned in like a radio to see that, it is also how slowly things vibrate which causes them to appear solid ( Yes the wall will hurt your head because your decoding that as your reality). What we are all part of is a broadcast play-out, something is resonating a frequency to hold this all in place, have a look at sacred geometry, check out sound forming rice into patterns and shapes, we're controlled completely like lab rats, but the controller is certainly not god like, and does not have our best interests at heart, and numbers can't work without letters, they are glyph's an runes, if you spend the first 15 years hearing teachers saying maths and numbers and english and words, it's quite hard to believe or see they are man made for a completely fifferent purpose, but you can't hide that form an aware awake mind that is tuned into something different, look at reality this way now do the maths and it will all add up.


Posted Image

John Carpenter was on to something.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users